IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answers

12 min read Academic & General Training

Writing Task 2 asks you to write a discursive essay of at least 250 words in response to a point of view, argument or problem. It is worth two thirds of your Writing band score - the most heavily weighted single task in the entire IELTS exam. Understanding the five question types and what each one requires is the foundation of Task 2 preparation.

Task 2 at a glance

Task 2 specifics (250 words, 40 minutes) are defined in the official IELTS Writing format.

Minimum words
250
Penalty if under
Recommended time
40 min
Including planning
Weight
Of Writing score
Question types
5
Each requires different approach

Model answers with examiner notes

Here are five full Task 2 essays, one for each question type, all written at Band 8. Read each essay first, then the notes that show why it scores well.

Opinion essay model (agree or disagree)

Question: Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many education systems are considering whether teenagers should be required to complete unpaid community service before they finish school. I strongly agree that this should be a compulsory part of high school, because it builds practical skills and a sense of social responsibility that classroom lessons alone cannot provide.

The first reason is that community service teaches abilities that are difficult to learn from textbooks. When students help at a care home or a local food bank, they must communicate with strangers, solve real problems and work as part of a team. A teenager who spends a term supporting elderly residents, for example, gains confidence and empathy that will help them in any future job. These qualities are increasingly valued by universities and employers.

A second, equally important reason is that compulsory service connects young people to their communities. Many teenagers have little contact with people outside their own age group or background. Volunteering breaks down that separation. It shows students that their actions can improve the lives of others, which encourages lifelong civic involvement. A country whose young people learn the habit of helping others is likely to enjoy stronger and more caring communities in the long run.

Some argue that forcing students to volunteer removes the spirit of genuine giving. While this concern is reasonable, most teenagers who are introduced to service through school continue to volunteer by choice once they understand its value.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that unpaid community service should be compulsory in high school. The benefits, both for the individual student and for society as a whole, clearly outweigh the objection that it should remain voluntary.

Why this scores Band 8:

  • The position is clear in the introduction and stays the same all the way through.
  • Each body paragraph develops one main idea with an explanation and a concrete example.
  • The opposing view is acknowledged briefly and then answered, which shows balance.
  • Linking is natural, using phrases like "The first reason" and "A second, equally important reason".
  • Vocabulary is precise, with items like "civic involvement" and "empathy" used correctly.

Discussion essay model (discuss both views)

Question: Some people think that children should start school at a very young age. Others believe they should start later. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

There is an ongoing debate about the right age for children to begin formal schooling. Some people favour an early start, while others argue that children benefit from beginning later. In my view, while an early start has some advantages, a slightly later beginning is better for most children.

Those who support starting school very young point to academic benefits. Young children absorb language and basic numeracy quickly, and an early routine can prepare them for the demands of later education. Supporters also note that early schooling provides reliable childcare, which helps parents who work. In countries where formal lessons begin at four or five, many children do learn to read sooner. This early confidence with letters and numbers can give them a useful head start.

On the other hand, many educators believe that a later start protects childhood development. Children who begin formal lessons too early may miss the unstructured play through which they build social skills, creativity and emotional control. In several countries where school begins at six or seven, students show no long-term disadvantage and often report greater enjoyment of learning. Unstructured play also builds the curiosity that keeps children motivated once formal study begins.

Weighing both sides, I believe a later start suits most children better. Early academic gains tend to fade, while the social and emotional foundations built through play have lasting value. A balanced approach, with structured play before the age of six and formal lessons afterwards, seems most sensible.

In conclusion, although early schooling offers short-term academic and practical benefits, I am convinced that a later start better supports the overall development of most children.

Why this scores Band 8:

  • Both views are covered fairly, one in each body paragraph, which the question requires.
  • The writer's own opinion is stated in the introduction and confirmed in the conclusion.
  • Each view is supported with reasons and examples, not just named.
  • Linking is varied and controlled, with phrases like "On the other hand" and "Weighing both sides".
  • The language is formal and accurate, with a range of sentence types.

Problem and solution essay model

Question: In many cities, traffic congestion is becoming a serious problem. What are the main causes of this, and what measures could be taken to solve it?

Traffic congestion is now a daily reality in many large cities around the world. This essay will examine the main causes of the problem and suggest some practical measures that could reduce it.

There are two principal causes of urban congestion. The first is the steady rise in private car ownership. As incomes have grown, owning a car has become normal rather than a luxury, so more vehicles compete for the same limited road space. The second cause is the weakness of public transport in many cities. When buses and trains are unreliable, overcrowded or expensive, people understandably prefer to travel by car, which adds to the congestion further. Poor road planning in many older cities makes these effects even worse.

Fortunately, several measures could ease the problem. The most effective solution is to invest heavily in public transport. If cities provide frequent, clean and affordable buses and trains, many drivers will choose to leave their cars at home. Singapore, for example, has reduced traffic through an efficient metro system combined with charges for driving into the city centre. A second useful measure is to encourage flexible working. When employers allow staff to work from home or travel outside peak hours, the pressure on roads at busy times falls sharply. Building safe cycle lanes is another low-cost measure, as it removes some cars from the road entirely.

In conclusion, urban congestion is mainly caused by rising car use and inadequate public transport. The problem can be reduced through serious investment in public transport and wider use of flexible working. With the right policies, cities can keep their citizens moving while improving the quality of urban life.

Why this scores Band 8:

  • Each cause is linked to a clear solution, which is what this question type rewards.
  • The introduction tells the reader what the essay will do, without copying the question.
  • An example like Singapore makes the solutions concrete and believable.
  • Linking is logical ("The first is", "The second cause", "A second useful measure").
  • The conclusion summarises the causes and solutions without adding new ideas.

Advantages and disadvantages essay model

Question: More and more people are choosing to work remotely from home rather than in an office. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?

Remote working has grown rapidly in recent years, with many employees now doing their jobs from home rather than in a traditional office. This essay will weigh the advantages and disadvantages of this trend and argue that, on balance, the benefits are greater.

There are clear advantages to working from home. The most obvious is the time and money saved on commuting. An employee who no longer travels two hours a day gains both free time and a smaller transport bill. Remote work also offers flexibility, allowing people to organise their day around family responsibilities, which can improve their overall wellbeing. For employers, there is a further benefit, as they can reduce the cost of expensive office space.

However, the trend also has real disadvantages. Working alone at home can lead to isolation, since employees miss the daily social contact of an office. Communication between team members can also become slower and less natural when it happens only through screens. In addition, some people find it hard to separate work from home life, which can lead to longer hours and stress. Younger employees in particular may struggle to learn from experienced colleagues when they rarely meet in person.

On balance, I believe the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. While isolation and communication are genuine concerns, they can be managed through regular video meetings and occasional office days. The savings in time, money and flexibility, by contrast, have a lasting positive effect on people's lives.

In conclusion, although remote working brings some difficulties, its benefits for both employees and employers are greater. With sensible management, the drawbacks can be reduced while the advantages are kept.

Why this scores Band 8:

  • Both advantages and disadvantages are covered, and the "do they outweigh" question is answered directly.
  • The position is clear: the writer states early that benefits are greater and confirms it at the end.
  • Each point is developed with a reason or example, not just listed.
  • The "On balance" paragraph weighs the two sides, which shows mature judgement.
  • The vocabulary is precise ("isolation", "flexibility", "wellbeing") and the register is formal.

Two-part question essay model

Question: In many countries, people are living longer than ever before. Why is this happening? Is it a positive or negative development?

In many parts of the world, average life expectancy has risen sharply, and people now live far longer than previous generations. This essay will explain why this is happening and argue that it is, overall, a positive development.

There are two main reasons for longer lives. The most important is the improvement in healthcare. Modern medicine can prevent and treat diseases that were once fatal, and vaccination programmes protect people from childhood. The second reason is the rise in living standards. Better nutrition, clean water and safer working conditions mean that people stay healthier for longer, which adds years to the average life. Public health campaigns about diet and smoking have also helped many people avoid serious illness.

In my view, this trend is mainly positive. Longer lives allow people to spend more years with their families and to keep contributing their skills and experience to society. Older people often play a valuable role by caring for grandchildren or volunteering in their communities. A society that keeps its older citizens active and respected benefits from their knowledge. Many older people also keep working or mentoring, which strengthens the economy rather than burdening it.

It is true that ageing populations create challenges, such as higher pension costs and greater pressure on health services. However, these problems can be managed through sensible planning, for example by encouraging saving and adjusting the retirement age. They do not outweigh the clear human value of a longer life.

In conclusion, people are living longer mainly because of better healthcare and higher living standards. Although this brings some economic challenges, I believe it is a positive development that reflects real human progress.

Why this scores Band 8:

  • Both questions are answered: the causes in one paragraph, and the positive view in the next.
  • The position (positive) is stated in the introduction and held to the end.
  • The challenge of ageing populations is acknowledged, then answered, which keeps balance.
  • Reasons are explained, not just listed, with everyday examples.
  • The essay uses formal language and a clear, logical structure.

Frequently asked questions

How many paragraphs should a Task 2 essay have?

Four paragraphs is standard and works for all question types: introduction, two body paragraphs, conclusion. Five paragraphs is fine if the fifth is justified by the question type. More than five usually means ideas are thinly spread across too many paragraphs, which reduces coherence and development scores.

Can I use personal examples in Task 2?

Yes. Personal examples are acceptable in IELTS Task 2 and can support your argument effectively. They should be used to illustrate a point, not as a substitute for reasoning. "For example, in my country..." is a valid supporting sentence. The key is that the example supports a well-developed argument - not that you avoid all personal reference.

Do I need a strong opinion in opinion essays?

You need a clear, consistent opinion - not necessarily an extreme one. "I strongly agree" and "I partially agree because..." are both valid positions. What is penalised is an unclear or shifting position: agreeing in one paragraph and disagreeing in another without acknowledging the contradiction. State your position early and maintain it.

Is it better to write about topics I know well?

Somewhat - but IELTS Task 2 topics are deliberately broad (technology, environment, education, health, society) so most candidates have something to say. More important than topic knowledge is the ability to develop ideas logically and support them with clear reasoning. A well-structured response on an unfamiliar topic scores higher than a rambling response on a familiar one.

Continue your IELTS preparation

Explore more free guides, practice tests and model answers across the four IELTS modules.