IELTS Writing Task 2 General Training

8 min read Academic & General Training

IELTS General Training Writing Task 2 is identical in format to Academic Task 2. The same five question types appear, the same marking criteria apply, and the same minimum word count of 250 is required. The key difference is the expected register. General Training candidates can use more concrete personal examples and direct opinion statements, while Academic candidates are expected to use more abstract reasoning and academic vocabulary. Both versions can score band 9 with the right approach.

Task 2 General at a glance

GT Task 2 is a 250-word essay in 40 minutes - see the official IELTS General Training Writing format.

Time
~40 min
Of 60-minute total
Word count
250 min
Aim for 260-290
Score weight
⅔ band
Twice Task 1 value
Tone
Semi-formal
Less abstract than Academic

Academic vs General Task 2 differences

The Task 2 prompt looks identical between the two test types, but examiners typically calibrate their expectations differently. Understanding the subtle differences helps you target the right register.

Academic Task 2

What examiners typically expect

  • Abstract academic vocabulary
  • Theoretical or research-based examples
  • Hedged language (often, tends to, may)
  • Complex cause-and-effect reasoning
  • References to studies or statistics
  • Formal third-person perspective
General Training Task 2

What examiners typically expect

  • Clear formal vocabulary but less abstract
  • Personal experience and real-world examples
  • Direct opinions and assertions
  • Practical, common-sense reasoning
  • Concrete examples from daily life
  • First-person perspective acceptable
Both versions use identical marking criteria

The four marking criteria (TR, CC, LR, GR) are exactly the same for both test types. A General Training candidate is not penalised for using academic vocabulary, and an Academic candidate is not penalised for using personal examples. The expectations differ in typical style, not in scoring rules.

The five question types you will see

Every Task 2 prompt falls into one of five types. Identifying the type correctly is the most important strategic decision on the entire Writing test.

Type 1

Opinion (Agree/Disagree)

Take a clear stance and defend it. "To what extent do you agree or disagree?" Common in General Training because it suits direct personal opinions.

Type 2

Discussion (Both views + opinion)

Discuss both views before giving your opinion. "Discuss both views and give your own opinion." Requires fair representation of opposing positions.

Type 3

Problem / Solution

Discuss causes and solutions to a stated problem. "What problems does this cause and what solutions exist?" Practical reasoning suits General Training.

Type 4

Advantages / Disadvantages

Weigh pros and cons. Sometimes asks "Do advantages outweigh disadvantages?" Requires balanced analysis with a clear conclusion.

The fifth type is the Two-part question, which combines two distinct questions in one prompt. Example: "Why do people commute long distances to work? How could this be reduced?" Treat each question separately with its own paragraph.

The four-paragraph structure

1

Introduction

Paraphrase question, state position (~40 words)

2

Body paragraph 1

Main point with personal example (~90 words)

3

Body paragraph 2

Second point with concrete example (~90 words)

4

Conclusion

Restate position, brief summary (~40 words)

How Task 2 General is marked

TR

Task Response

Did you address all parts of the question? Is your position clear and consistent? Are your ideas developed with examples?

25% of Task 2
CC

Coherence & Cohesion

Logical paragraph structure? Natural flow? Linking devices used appropriately?

25% of Task 2
LR

Lexical Resource

Range of vocabulary appropriate for the tone? Less common items used naturally?

25% of Task 2
GR

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Variety of complex sentence structures? Conditionals, passives used correctly?

25% of Task 2

What makes General Training Task 2 easier or harder than Academic

General Training Task 2 has both advantages and disadvantages compared to Academic Task 2. Understanding both helps you prepare strategically.

Easier aspects

Personal examples accepted readily. Direct opinions appreciated. Common-sense reasoning sufficient. No need to invent statistics or studies. Concrete real-world topics suit candidates with less academic background.

Harder aspects

Same word count requirement (250 minimum). Same marking criteria. Same time pressure. Some General Training candidates have less academic writing experience than Academic candidates, which can make essay structure feel unfamiliar.

Personal examples that work in Task 2 General

One major advantage of Task 2 General is the freedom to use personal examples that would feel out of place in Academic Task 2. These can dramatically improve your Task Response score when used well.

1

Workplace experience

"In my previous job at a retail company, we observed that..." Direct workplace examples are highly acceptable. They show practical understanding of real-world issues.

2

Family or community examples

"In my community, families who..." Examples from your local context demonstrate that you understand how broader issues affect daily life.

3

Personal observations

"From my experience living in two different countries..." Cross-cultural observations work particularly well for topics involving society, culture, and education.

4

Avoid: highly specific personal stories

"My sister bought a phone in 2019 and..." Examples that are too narrow can hurt your essay. Use personal context to illustrate broader points, not as the entire argument.

Personal examples that work in General Training Task 2

Example typeHow to phrase itWhy it works
Workplace"In my previous job, we found that..."Shows real understanding of work issues
Community"In my community, families who..."Links the topic to daily life
Cross-cultural"From living in two countries, I noticed..."Strong for society and education topics
Too narrow, avoid"My sister bought a phone in 2019..."Too specific, use it for a wider point only

The mistakes that cost most candidates half a band

1

Writing without taking a clear position

Sitting on the fence caps your Task Response at band 5. Take a clear stance. Personal opinion essays in General Training particularly reward strong, defensible positions.

2

Examples that are too narrow

"My friend John lost his job because..." is too specific. Use personal context to illustrate broader patterns: "Many people I know in my industry have experienced..."

3

Mixing register inconsistently

Starting formal ("In contemporary society") then switching casual ("anyway, this is bad") undermines coherence. Pick a register and maintain it.

4

Using contractions throughout

"I'm", "don't", "won't" are too casual for Task 2 even in General Training. Use full forms: "I am", "do not", "will not". This is a consistent register marker.

The "balanced view without opinion" trap

Many candidates write balanced essays presenting both sides without committing to a view. They think this looks fair and mature. To examiners, it signals indecision and lowers Task Response. Take a position. You can acknowledge the opposing view, but your stance must be clear.

Band 6 vs Band 7 paragraph comparison

Here is a body paragraph from an essay arguing that more people should work from home. Written at band 6, then reworked to band 7.

Band 6

"Working from home is good because people save time on commuting. They have more time for their family and hobbies. Also they spend less money on transport and food. For example, I save 2 hours each day when I work from home. So companies should let people work from home."

Band 7

"Remote work offers significant time and financial benefits for employees. By eliminating daily commutes, workers gain valuable hours for family responsibilities and personal interests, which often translates into improved mental health and productivity. Many people I know save approximately £200 monthly on transport, parking and meals out, money they can redirect toward savings or essential expenses."

What changed
"Working from home" upgraded to "remote work"
"Good" replaced with "significant time and financial benefits"
Specific example with concrete number (£200 monthly)
Cause-and-effect reasoning shown explicitly
Personal example generalized ("Many people I know")

Choose your preparation path

Frequently asked questions

Is Task 2 the same for Academic and General Training?

The prompts are identical and the marking criteria are identical. The only difference is that Academic candidates typically use more abstract vocabulary while General Training candidates can use more concrete personal examples. Both can score band 9.

Can I use personal experience in Task 2 General?

Yes. This is one of the main advantages of General Training Task 2. Personal experience and concrete real-world examples are highly acceptable and often more impactful than invented statistics. Use them as illustrations of broader points, not as your entire argument.

How many words should I write for Task 2 General?

Aim for 260-290 words. The minimum is 250 words. Going significantly above 300 is not penalised but tends to hurt quality because longer essays are harder to keep coherent.

Can I use "I think" in Task 2 General?

Yes, used carefully. "I believe", "In my opinion", "It seems to me" are all acceptable in General Training Task 2. Avoid overusing them, every paragraph should not start with "I think". Mix opinion markers with more direct assertions.

How do I improve from Task 2 General band 6 to band 7?

The most common gap is idea development. Band 6 essays state ideas but do not develop them with examples, explanations, or evidence. Band 7 essays take each idea further with 3-4 sentences of development. Practice extending every point before moving to the next.

Continue your IELTS preparation

Explore more free guides, practice tests and model answers across the four IELTS modules.